Expanding the Idea of New Work: Part II

by:  Charles Haugland at 04/21/2010

Contributed by Charles Haugland, in response to Lisa Timmel's recent post. 

I'm curious about your theory of the "Goldilocks Point," this balancing point between new work and old work that is different for every individual. I believe that it exists in the aggregate; our audience here has a balancing point for the number of new works/number of classics in our season. But, what I hear from individuals takes a different approach. 

One woman tells me, "I think the Huntington should stick to the tried-and-true classics. It's what you're good at, and plays like All My Sons are the ones I enjoy the most." Another says, "It's always the new plays that I think of as the Huntington's biggest successes - Melinda Lopez's Sonia Flew or Lydia Diamond's play Stick Fly." What's remarkable to me is that neither is talking about balance. They're talking about which they prefer, and they are positioning this as a binary choice: those who like new work, those who like classics. But, is it a binary? Certainly, I don't think it is. Who are we as a theatre that sits between the two? 

It gets me thinking about theatre and pleasure. And, as you say, new plays or old plays are not individually "important" for this time-based classification - whatever important means - but they do appeal to different parts of our minds and even to fundamentally different audiences. 

Classic plays are a kind of active nostalgia, a longing for home. We long for old stories, we long for the turn that we know is coming, we love the terrible (or joyful) anticipation of it. How do you long for a new play? 

And yet I do, and I think you do, too. We feel it as a kind of empty space in ourselves, and not for just any new play, but to hear a play that tells a story we have never heard before, a story so specific that it feels as if it's the story of our own lives, a story we've tried to tell ourselves again and again but never had the words, the images, the mirror of experience to make sense of it. (Next season has both of these kinds of pleasure for me, including this second kind of pleasure in the just-announced-today three-play Annie Baker festival.)

Is it then a relatively recent idea that the pleasure of returning to a culturally familiar story or the pleasure of an entirely new story are best experienced if they walk hand-in-hand? That is probably the subject for another post. But, from the Greeks to the Elizabethans to commercial theatres of the 19th century, there have always been both "classic" and "new" work in the marketplace, often performed by the same actors under the same roof. Did those theatres think about the Goldilocks Point? I know we do.

Depending on where you sit, regional theaters have morphed over the last fifty years into either a flippant idea of "It matters to you to see these seven plays, because we're doing them" (if anyone ever believed that idea, it is dying along with subscription numbers) or a more earnest one: These plays matter to you, because this is an ongoing conversation. These plays matter to you, because they are part of a legacy that began and is ongoing.

- Charles 

What do you think? Leave your thoughts here


  1. to sink it hard, however, can not always have the grip sinking wandering soul; how many people floating lifeless, loss of conscience in officialdom in the property, the "Man's nature is good," the true meaning strangles, devoid! Nan said: "Reading the history of three thousand years, nothing more than fame and fortune, nine miles enlightenment, is always pastoral poetry and wine." House is nothing more than another big body capacity Seoul five feet, more luxurious car, but also a means of transport. And, lined with tall buildings block who look exactly Castle sight? A dusty haze in the end who had dyed a healthy body? Luxurious life, we "read" to what? Abandoned villages, we "see" what was the reason? The future, can allow you and I give up luxury, away from the hubbub, like a mountain stream, as guardian, silent love, loving flowers waiting for a quiet beauty, ecological plot together better living environment? If you can, please promise me, like a river clean watch lovingly mountains, grass smoothie like that, simple quiet life, tranquil forward; natural seeding in a calm Ning Wen Wanqing, Shizumori cloud water, the equanimity, I let you freely in the blue sky breathing, totem! Spring deep place I do not know, a touch long stream flow. Screenshot touch of sweet flowers, willing gorgeous bloom in nature, so tempting arms brilliant mind, Xu Li Kangan gas in the new body, long far Ju a handful of clear streams warm heart, the inhaled gas exhaled;. A Species thread spring in mind, let love in Life is a never-ending journey through some wonderful, some rough Ke Hum, and my life, flying all the way! While not exciting, memorable enough! People are yearning for a meteoric rise, meteoric rise in life, do you not know the way eloquent, I love you Shannon is also a supreme level. And my life is so! Even if not beautiful and seductive, but the way of atmosphere, the scenery along the way is enough to make you enjoy endless. While not asking for the moon, though not into the sky, while the middle part of twists and turns, bustling, too adorable! This life, it was jealousy, it was envy. Jealous of my life is so cheerful! I envy the pace is so fly Jian! My life, flying all the way! To say is fate! It goes well, but also crooked; it twists and turns, they still flew quickly. Midway There are many memorials, villain obstruction, there are corrupt resistance. Suffering does not exclude these, how you can travel on the sea? How flying all the way? For me the bottom of a people, be quick degrees, can be described as lucky! Although I did not complete the last mission now, because travel is not over yet. I'm still on the road flew, I still wander the landscape. In fact, the twists and turns of life is not a kind of beauty? People say, infinite in the awesome scenery! I think this is a kind of aesthetic realm! Mediocre is not beautiful life. Only bitter, tired, it felt sweet life. I believe, at the end of life, it is when I the beautiful scenery. At that time, when is my glory. I would like to contaminated dust on the road and are willing to enjoy the scenery on the way. At least there are simple ideas, have experience in the struggle. We do not undergo soil, how to know human suffering? Do not experience the experience along the way, it turns out the world's dangerous? Jing spine through the ups and downs, to get genuine talent they need to get the right position they need. Therefore, the twists and turns for me, is a great beauty in life, life is a wonderful story. There is the life story of a perfect life! Flying life is largely a qualitative leap! Leap, is progress. And I was to survive the leap in progress in the front row. Midway mantis, bugs, ants, cinch! Great risk, of course, need to adjust, need to integrate. As you know, the

Post a Comment


About me

Lisa Timmel,  Bevin O'Gara, and Charles Haugland share their thoughts on New Plays, Dramatury, and their experience sharing nightly conversations with the audiences that come to see our shows. Get the inside scoop of new scripts and play development!

© 2021 The Huntington. All rights reserved | Trouble viewing this site? Please download Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome.