Fighting For Respect with AWMC Finalist Derek Lindesay

by:  Derek Lindesay at 05/10/2013

It is truly hard to find words that can express my gratitude to Alex Truppi and everyone else at the Huntington who has worked with me over the past five years. I would not have had the courage to go out on stage at the August Wilson Theatre and perform. When I'm up on stage I feel as if I'm fighting for my life and fighting for respect. Ever since I was a boy, I have never felt admired or respected by others. I have always been shy and I am even still afraid to talk to others in person today. But when I'm on stage I transform due to the fact that I am fighting for respect.

The one message I will take away from this whole experience is the importance of battling for everything you want in life. August Wilson described himself as a "struggling playwright" because he was always trying to make better plays. His characters and plays embody this idea of "struggling" as they fight and stand for what they believe in. I've realized that I must work harder in order to make my dreams a reality because for me, the sky really is the limit. When I'm on stage I try to perfom in a way that makes sure that everyone remembers my name. In life I must achieve enough success to guarantee they hear it again.

I was really lucky to meet other great young people from across the country last weekend. In a world with so much negativity, it's great to know that there are so many good people out there. I wish Antonio, Iliana, and the rest of my fellow Wilsonian Soldiers the best of luck in their future endeavors. They truly deserve it!

Comments

  1. Zune and iPod: Most people campore the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It's very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
  2. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web bsrwoer. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it'll do even better in those areas, but for now it's a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod's strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
  3. Hi, just stopped by and oh I love your blog! You have a great style.About that pants: I know this post is a while back, but did you alaerdy bought these? I am willing to sell mine price tag still on it -Let me hear, then we'll fix a nice price together ;) http://vqateqneqc.com [url=http://sujqrj.com]sujqrj[/url] [link=http://hvhdohvuku.com]hvhdohvuku[/link]
  4. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose. cheap auto insurance
  5. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose. cash back best credit card
  6. Hi Tamas,Let’s stick to one or two points at a time. I think this will make the debate clearer. I hope that’s ok with you.Well… I note that there are more than ten points in your comment, actually, but no matter. In fact, it seems that the main issue you’re not addressing here is that of the differences in data quality between surface and satellite measurements (for the purpose of establishing global temperature trends), but it appears that you’re continuing to quote UAH satellite figures.There is no data set of world temperatures that shows any rise in the past 10 years. I don’t see how you can get around that fact, particularly since CO2 emissions have been greater than ever.To put it bluntly, I can get around that because it’s not actually true, and it’s also only a very small part of the real picture. Firstly, to play the (ridiculously arbitrary) game of looking at a linear trend over the last ten years… if we look at the actual data it shows .Or did you mean that ? In other words, we should pick the year that happened to have the strongest El Niño in a century as the point of reference? Even using 1998 as a starting point, we see the lowest quality data (UAH) showing a drop, Hadley basically flat, and GISS (the highest quality index) showing a rise.If we’re going to indulge in silly cherry-picking, ? Hmm, nope, that shows warming too. The point here is that annual averages over a short period like 10 years tell you nothing much; they’re dominated by short term variability like El Niño and La Niña. Long term averages, such as over 30 years, produce a much clearer picture of the underlying trend (climate change).Much more importantly, it’s crucial to understand that the land and atmosphere temperatures (especially short term data) are a tiny part of the picture. Far more of the planetary warming that is currently happening has taken place in the oceans. See .However, it cooled from the 1940’s to the 1970’s – a period of around 30 years. This occurred as industrial production and CO2 emissions really cranked up after WWII. How can we explain that cooling period?I’m astonished, Tamas, that you can have been reading and inquiring into issues of climate change for, apparently, many months at least, but have not yet encountered the basics on the changes in temperature forcings over the 20th century. Please don’t tell me that you’ve been relying on sites like “Watts Up With That” and “Climate Audit” for your information. They have a long and rich history of getting facts completely wrong, and of utterly failing to understand the science.I highly recommend you read . The breakdown of the forcings is shown in Figure 5 of that article. The big picture is that, while greenhouse gases were rising in the first half of the 20th century, a combination of other forcings (primarily tropospheric aerosols) rose at the same time, offsetting the greenhouse gas warming. After around 1970, though, the greenhouse warming accelerated while the aerosol cooling grew much more slowly, and in fact plateaued after around 1990.Also, I should point out that the instrumental record does not actually show cooling throughout the 1940s-to-1970s period; the cooling was limited to just a few years, from 1944 to the early 1950s (and just one year, 1945, in the southern hemisphere). In the wartime years leading up to 1945, most sea surface temperature measurements were taken by US ships, who measured the temperature of the intake water used for cooling the ship’s engines. This method tends to yield higher temperatures due to the warm engine-room environment. However, in August 1945, British ships resumed taking sea surface temperature measurements. British crews collected water in uninsulated buckets. The bucket method has a cooling bias. Consequently we see a large and sudden drop in the temperature record in 1945.Also – the hockey stick. I guess we’re just going to have to disagree on this one. I find Mann, Briffa et al to be a bunch of frauds. Why did Briffa refuse to release his data for almost 10 years?Mmmm-hmm. I’m afraid I have to interpret that as “I’ll believe anything I read at Watts Up With That and Climate Audit”. The statement that “Briffa refused to release his data for almost 10 years” is in fact (a) false and (b) ludicrously irrelevant to the level of scientific confidence in the “hockey stick”.The hockey stick is only “controversial” and “discredited” in the denial-o-sphere. In the real world, in the realm of peer reviewed science, it has been repeatedly and comprehensively validated from many sources.Seriously, I suggest you read the articles I linked to in my last comment.There is much evidence to show that the medieval and Roman warm periods were warmer than today.Not on a global basis, there isn’t. It appears that there was a Medieval Warm Period in some parts of Europe and North America, sure.Was the temperature across the whole of Europe and North America higher at that time than now? Extremely unlikely, given the evidence.Was the global temperature higher at that time than now? No way.See . My point is this: The climate is variable and has changed suddenly and without any help from humanity in the past. Why do we suddenly think that a tiny increase in CO2 is responsible for the tiny amount of warming we’ve seen in the past century? How can we rule out natural factors?See the information on forcings above; it’s very clear that CO2 and other greenhouse gases are the primary factor in the current warming.The increase in CO2 can hardly be described as tiny. Over the last million years or so, we’ve seen a relatively stable climate, with long ice ages (at a CO2 level of around 180ppm) interspersed by short interglacial periods (at a CO2 level of around 280ppm). The current CO2 level is around 390ppm – much higher than humans have ever seen. We’re seeing temperatures rising at least five times faster, and CO2 increasing around fifty times faster, than during past natural warming events at the end of ice ages.Beyond that, there is strong evidence for major amplifying feedbacks between temperature and CO2 (and other greenhouse gases). Feedbacks such as the release of methane from permafrost, the outgassing of CO2 from the oceans, the reduction of albedo due to ice melt, and potentially even larger processes such as the release of methane clathrates, will come into play as the temperature rises.And, yes, the climate has changed dramatically in the past, sometimes within a decade or even one year. And the impacts have been profound. The hope is that we can avoid triggering such an event again.Really, what we’re wrestling with here is not simply “global warming” – it’s better described as “climate disruption”. accutane onlinle cialis dose ordering prednisone online
  7. Tamas, I wasn’t saying you were one of the conspiracy theorists because, as far as I am aware, you have not any statement to that effect. I was meaning the fervent anti-AGW brigade over on Bolt’s or Blair’s blogs, and others.I do actually agree with you, partly, about the fervent ‘green ideology’ side of the equation as well. In that the more strident – for wont of a better word – “supporters” of AGW do go over the top in their claims of – your word – ‘apocalypse’.I prefer to stick with the rational people on either side, who put forward coherent arguments either for or against. Such that I can read their viewpoint, examine their argument, and then either agree or disagree with the conclusion.I disagree with you over the ‘argument from authority’ angle. I instead see the arguments – properly put – for AGW put forward by those institutions following the logic and reason of the explored and fully examined science.I also can look at the history of the world’s climate, and agree that it has changed over time. After all I do hold a degree in geology, and thus spent 4 years (I failed one) examining the worlds history in the long term. My disagreement with you concerns the extent, and apparent rapidity, of the current changes. In that my readings of the science, specifically the relatively short term input of mankind in digging up and then burning off fossil fuels, in the last two hundred years or so, has had a marked effect on the climate as a whole.I also disagree with you that the alternative views are ‘highly credible’, because most of those in the anti-AGW camp are definitely not following scientific principles. To me the main AGW opponents, both the scientists and the media commentators, are desperately trying to report anything that may disprove AGW, and then fitting facts to match their beliefs. And yes, I use the word ‘beliefs’ deliberately.For example, your arguments for solar activity, volcanoes, plate tectonics, etc.. etc.. have all – from my scientific viewpoint – been proven to be not the main drivers of the current observable changes. Please note I do not claim they play no part in our climate, although plate tectonics is stretching the point in the short or medium term (long term being in the 10′s of millions of years geologically), just that their role is insignificant compared to other factors.I can’t find anything to support your statement that the “G20 conference recently announced that they would not allow the world’s temperature to rise more than 2C by controlling CO2 emissions.”“Not allow” Tamas?Maybe it would be more accurate to say something along the lines that the G20 pledged to try to reduce emissions such that the global temperature may not rise by more than predicted 2 degrees in the next 10, 20 or 40 years (whatever the target year was – 2020, 2030, or 2050). So it wasn’t a claim about controlling the Earth’s climate, was it?I find it intriguing that you think that “Mann, Briffa et al have been shown to be sloppy in their work”. On whose word do you concur they have been ‘sloppy’? Or is that just another anti-AGW exaggeration? After all, ‘sloppy’ would be rather an extreme critique from a scientist.I await your MWP links in the meantime.(No riposte to my ‘man in the pub’ comment. I am most upset… ;}} ) online buy viagra
  8. this is not a full assignment i need full.. there is a only 1 qns...solved out of 3....cn u plzzz uplaod a full assignment...if u send me on my email ID.. soo plzzz send it fast.....@...Simrat.luckyp9@gmail.com...
  9. pip insurance auto health insurance quotes inexpensive auto insurance quote insurance auto
  10. discount car insurance online casino auto insurance quote affordable health insurance cheep health insuarance for sy insurance quotes auto cheap insurence car
  11. cheap car insurance florida health insurance quotes instant car insurance car insurance quotes
  12. Pennsylvania Health Insurance compare car insurance get car insurance quotes cheap auto insurance
  13. continental insurance auto budget car insurance health insurance qutoes cheap auto insurance
  14. insurance auto home insurance quote cheapest car insurance policy company courses online tax preparation car insurance quote low cost insurance auto
  15. no prescription viagra cheap car insurance casino online New York City nj car insurance quotes cheap car insurance online poker
  16. cheao car insuranceed
  17. car insurance quotes
  18. cheap car insurance auto insurance quotes free Cheap Car Insurance Quote life insurance rates car insurance
  19. slots available online courses viagra sales online online casino Generic Cialis sale
  20. Law Of Attraction Suggestions - Exactly how To Manifest Money With YOUR Thoughts As The Driver Learn how to manifest cheap converse shoes uk money and your financial problems will definitely be over. If one need to effectively study just how to draw in funds making use of the Statute of Attraction, you have actually had to go deeper than merely doing assertions and also" thinking positive. Abundance is like all the other aspects of life that can be located cheap converse shoes in the bagua from feng shui: Fame|Reputation, Relationship|Love, Imagination|Children, Helpful People|Travel, Vocation|Life Path, Abilities & Expertise|Wisdom, Family members|Foundation, Propserity|Abundance. I like this certain post because it is not attempting to get you to buy some cheesy book about just how magic will certainly make you rich. When you study just how to converse shoes uk favorably hone in your ideas on what you prefer to think and obtain, you will definitely have the commitment and will power to take action. This is where the prosperity and the cash have been born. As soon as you discover exactly how to favorably hone in your ideas on what you would like to believe and accomplish, you will definitely have the incentive and will power to take action.
  21. If you want to cheer on America's Team with the latest NFL Jerseys, the place to get it first is at Bestbuyjerseys.com. We have the quality Nike products you need: jerseys, hats, t-shirts, shorts, and more. The China NFL Shop is your trusted source for Cheap Jerseys for men, women, and kids. Root on America's Team with cheap NFL custom apparel and collectible merchandise. Exclusive products and gear from Nike, Mitchell & Ness, and other brands coupled with exclusive online discounts and fast shipping make the cheap jerseys store of the NFL your ideal source for NFL apparel and merchandise. Shop jerseys and gear from San Francisco 49ers Jerseys,New Orleans Saints Jerseys!
  22. pbtdtyhi money mutual >:-OOO next day loans =-] payday loans XGZRT payday loans >:-[ payday loans 0069

Post a Comment

       
User verification Image for user verification  

About me

One of the most extensive and admired programs in the country, the Huntington’s Education Department serves more than 10,000 students, teachers, and community organizations each year with student matinees, state-wide Poetry Out Loud and the August Wilson Monologue Competition

This blog will feature updates from Donna Glick, Director of Education, Meg O'Brien, Manager of Education Operations, Alexandra Truppi, Education Manager for Curriculum & Instruction, as well as students and community members who have been involved the Huntington's programs.

Avenue of the Arts / BU Theatre: 264 Huntington Avenue, Boston MA 02115
South End / Calderwood Pavilion at the BCA: 527 Tremont Street, Boston MA 02116
Main: 264 Huntington Avenue, Boston MA 02115 | 617 266 7900 | BOX OFFICE 617 266 0800

© 2013 Huntington Theatre Company. All rights reserved | Trouble viewing this site? Please download Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome.